Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Controversy surrounding self-selection of P medicines sparks debate in pharmacy sector

Controversy surrounding self-selection of P medicines sparks debate in pharmacy sector
RPS calls for further evidence says it is "clearly at odds with regulator, and the practice taking place in a significant number of pharmacies"

In a surprising move that has divided the pharmacy profession, the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) has sanctioned hundreds of pharmacies to allow patients to self-select certain Pharmacy (P) medicines, a decision met with strong opposition from the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) as well as from the Pharmacy Defense Association (PDA).

In a statement, RPS shared that at a board meeting held on 19th June, they expressed "disappointment" over what they described as a lack of prior consultation and comprehensive communication from the GPhC regarding the implications of this policy shift.


They argue that allowing patients to self-select certain P medicines could potentially jeopardize established professional guidelines and compromise the role of pharmacists in ensuring safe medication use.

"Enabled by the General Pharmaceutical Council, we understand that hundreds of pharmacies, from large multiples to small independents, have been approved by the regulator to enable patients to self-select certain P medicines," the statement said.

"In each case, the sale of the P medicine is still required to take place within registered premises and under the supervision of a pharmacist."

Following a meeting with the GPhC and a pharmacy contractor to brief the three National Pharmacy Boards on the patient safety guarantees that have permitted the regulatory body to sanction this modification,  RPS called for further evidence "to ensure any potential forthcoming changes to our professional guidance are truly evidence based."

"We are continuing to consider our current position, which is now clearly at odds with regulator, and the practice taking place in a significant number of pharmacies."

Consequently, the RPS called upon the GPhC and a pharmacy contractor to brief the three National Pharmacy Boards on the patient safety guarantees that have permitted the regulatory body to sanction this modification.

Plans to adopt 'facilitated self-selection'

Conversely, the GPhC defends its decision, emphasising that facilitated self-selection will be accompanied by robust safeguards to uphold regulatory standards.

Roz Gittins, Chief Pharmacy Officer at the GPhC, underscored the importance of pharmacist supervision during the dispensing process and said:

"Our long-standing position on this has been that self-selection of P Medicines would not be compatible with our regulatory standards without key safeguards being in place.

"This includes ensuring continued compliance with the current legal requirement for pharmacist supervision, and assurance that any arrangements put in place secure patient and public safety."

While the GPhC acknowledged the pharmacists' need to "innovate and develop provide new ways of working" and delivering patient-care, as the regulator, they said:

"We don’t seek to stifle innovation, but to make sure that registered pharmacies meet our standards, as well as any relevant legal requirements, whilst maintaining the safety of their services."

Following their recent participation in the RPS Board meeting, the (GPhC) has acknowledged the need for clearer language regarding the self-selection of P-medicines.

They recognised that previous terms like 'open display' might imply reduced pharmacist involvement.

Therefore, the GPhC plans to adopt 'facilitated self-selection' to emphasize the crucial role of pharmacists and pharmacy teams in overseeing the supply of medicines.

This change aims to improve clarity and align with ongoing sector feedback and review processes as  the regulatory board says "they will continue to monitor developments through our normal inspection activity".

PDA advocates for robust patient safety measures

The PDA’s stance is reinforced by historical context; in 2012, a chief pharmacist notably remarked, “P medicines are the tools of a clinician, and they should not be made available on open display.”

They argue that the traditional model, where pharmacists play a central role in advising on and dispensing medications, ensures optimal patient safety.

As the debate intensifies, the RPS has indicated plans to solicit further evidence and feedback to inform potential revisions to its professional guidelines.

The GPhC has developed an FAQ on facilitating self-selection of pharmacy medicines to answers key questions, including about managing risks and about safeguards.

More For You

Pharmacist Support calls for birthday donations to meet rising demand for mental health services

More and more pharmacy professionals are reaching out for help, said Danielle Hunt.

Pharmacist Support's birthday appeal: Donate to address growing mental health demand

Pharmacist Support – the independent charity dedicated to the pharmacy profession – is celebrating 184 years of service with the launch of a special birthday donations appeal.

On 15 April, the charity is urging individuals and organisations across the sector to support its campaign to raise vital funds to meet the increasing demand for its mental health and wellbeing services.

Keep ReadingShow less
Prostate cancer: At-home saliva test could save NHS £500 million annually

PRS saliva test can identify prostate cancer that was missed by an MRI scan

Photo credit: gettyimages

Prostate cancer: Spit test better than blood test in spotting men at highest risk

A simple at-home spit test could help detect prostate cancer earlier, saving the NHS around £500 million a year, according to new research published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), the study found that the DNA-based saliva test was more accurate than the current prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test in identifying men at risk of developing prostate cancer.

Keep ReadingShow less
RPS launches innovative new learning resources for members

With RPS Learn, pharmacists can develop a new skill or improve their understanding of practice or a clinical topic.

Gettyimages

RPS launches new learning resources to boost career development for members

The Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) has launched a new online learning platform designed to support the practice, development and career advancement of its members.

The new platform, called RPS Learn, offers a diverse range of bite-size learning content, available on-demand, catering to all levels — from introductory to advanced and specialist —combining new content with RPS's renowned expertise in education and training to achieve excellence for learners.

Keep ReadingShow less
NICE approves AstraZeneca’s twice-a-day tablet ‘capivasertib’ for advanced breast cancer

HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer is currently incurable, and treatment aims to slow progression and prolong life

Gettyimages

NICE approves twice-a-day tablet for advanced breast cancer

Every year, thousands of people with hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative breast cancer could benefit from a new twice-a-day tablet, now set to be funded immediately through the Cancer Drugs Fund.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has approved the use of capivasertib (also known as Truqap), in combination with fulvestrant, as an option for around 1,100 adults with HR-positive HER2-negative breast cancer that has certain genetic mutations and has spread.

Keep ReadingShow less
ABPI and government fast-track VPAG scheme review to address high medicine payment rates

The 2025 VPAG payment rate for newer medicines has been set at 22.9 per cent.

Photo credit: gettyimages

Review of 2024 VPAG scheme to be completed by June

The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) and the government have agreed to bring forward a planned review of the 2024 Voluntary Scheme for Branded Medicines Pricing, Access, and Growth (VPAG), originally scheduled for autumn 2025.

The review is expected to be completed in June 2025, aligning with the anticipated release of the government’s 10-year NHS Plan and the Life Sciences Sector Plan as part of the broader industry strategy this summer.

Keep ReadingShow less